Obama Case Assigned To CJ, Jones

 

Chief Judge Jones With Grandaughter

Stimac vs. Obama, a lawsuit challenging the grand jury policices of President Barack Obama and U.S. Attorneys in the nation’s 94 federal judicial district has been assigned to the Hon. Robert Jones, Chief Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Nevada District.

A Nevada native, Jones was appointed to the federal bench by President George Bush in 2003.

 

Haag’s Sequestering Of Federal Grand Jury Violates 1st & 5th Amendments

Haag

Wagner

The sequestering of San Francisco’s Federal Grand Jury by U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag violates the 1st and 5th Amendment rights of the citizens of the Northern District of California, Network CEO Phil Stimac announced today.

“This is an unprecedented

Falsified Evidence Case Against State Bar Board Member Sets New Federal Judicial Immunity Standard

 

Dumanis

George

An order issued on May 10, 2010 by United States Judge William Hays, has set a new federal standard for public and court officials who fix or knowingly participate in the fixing of cases with

Haag Asked To Present Evidence Of Title 18 Violations By George To Federal Grand Jury

     

George

Haag

Network CEO Phil Stimac has asked U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag to present evidence of violations of Title 18 of the United States Code by Ronald George, Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court to the federal grand jury. The request came in response to a letter to Stimac dated September 13 from one of George’s deputy clerks.

In a certified letter, Stimac had previously asked the Chief Justice

Congress Trumps Executive And Judicial Branches In Impeachment Case

 

Hon. Robert Porteous

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Cal

The impeachment trial of U.S. District Judge Robert Porteous is showing the media and American people that the balance of powers doctrine is alive and well. Porteous, 63, who sits on the federal court in the Eastern District of Louisiana, goes on trial this week before a 12 member U.S. Senate committee.

The U.S. Justice Department initially refused to prosecute Proteous on grounds of insufficient evidence.  But a House Judiciary Committee task force

Aguilar Case Established Obstruction Of Justice Standard In 9th Circuit

 

Russoniello

Hebert

Haag

A case against a U.S. District Judge which arose in the Northern District of California established the standard for analyzing charges of obstruction of justice against public and judicial officials. In that case, United States vs. Aguilar [1995] 515 U.S. 593, San Jose, CA district judge Robert Aguilar was convicted of

New U.S. Attorney On Trial: DOJ’s Jury Tampering Double Standard

Hoffa

Russoniello

Haag

Joe Russosniello’s swift flight from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Francisco has now put allegations of his grand jury tampering in plain view. Jury tampering can take various forms. After a decade-long personal feud with Bobby Kennedy, the U.S. Department of Justice was able to obtain the conviction of Teamter Union President Jimmy Hoffa for allegedly trying to

More Ethics Complaints In State Bar Conspiracy

Haag

Russoniello

The swift exodus of Joseph Russoniello from his post as U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California with pending allegations of grand jury tampering against him, has given rise to a new State Bar complaint being filed against the former federal prosecutor.

Also named for violating their attorney oaths and

9th Circuit’s 2010 Judicial Conference Opens Old Wounds For Victims Of State Bar Conspiracy

this site is under construction

Hebert Continues To Ignore 5th Amendment To Protect State Bar’s Elite

President-Elect William Hebert

Chief Trial Counsel James Towery

An ethical complaint filed against William Hebert reveals the newly elected State Bar President is making plans to add teeth to illegal and discriminatory policies set in motion by out-going President Howard Miller.

In a letter to U.S.  Attorney Melinda Haag, Network CEO Phil Stimac claims Hebert and Chief Trial Counsel James Towery are giving elite members