DOJ Section Chief Detached From Realities Of State Bar Conspiracy

Main Justice Bldg. Washington, D.C.

A letter dated May 5, 2010 and bearing the reference “WH 735879″ has become a critical piece of evidence to show patterns of racketeering in The State Bar Conspiracy, according to Network CEO Phil Stimac.  In it, Robert Moossy, Jr.,

When Does Obama’s Failure To Act Meet “Enterprise-In-Fact” Test?

President Barrack Obama

In Boyle vs. U.S. 452 U.S. at _ [2009], the United States Supreme Court rejected the notion that an ascertainable structure was necessary  to find an enterprise-in-fact for purposes of the federal RICO statute.  Notwithstanding Boyle, Network CEO Phil Stimac believes the organizational structure of the U.S. Department of Justice, coupled with the flow of information between the White House, the Main Justice Building and the U.S. Attorneys Office in San Francisco supports a finding of the existence of an enterprise in the State Bar Conspiracy.

This site is under construction.

Note:  Phil Stimac is not a licensed attorney. The above information is for educational purposes only. Individuals seeking legal advice should consult their local bar association referral service.

Friends In High Places – Government Lawyers’ Longevity Fertile Grounds For Patterns Of Racketerring

Paul Grossman, Regional Civil Rights Attorney, U.S. Department of Education

For more than thirty years, Paul Grossman has rubbed elbows with high-ranking government officials while planning, setting and reviewing policy and enforcing the civil rights of students and teachers in 8 western states.  Over their life-time careers, federal lawyers like Grossman also build strong associations with other career lawyers in public service.

Ralph Black, long-time attorney for California Community Colleges

While serving a lengthy term in the legal department of California Community Colleges, Ralph Black, for example, participated with Grossman in civil rights and disability seminars. Together they administered a civil rights methods of administration document for the largest educational recipient of federal funds in the nation.  With

Do Feds and State Bar Meet RICO “Enterprise-In-Fact Test” Under Boyle vs. U.S.?

Main Justice Bldg. Washington, D.C.

A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision has made it easier for State Bar members to understand the kinds of relationships which give rise to claims under the federal RICO statute.  State Bar members who sue the U.S. Government are  well aware of what happens when opposing counsel flash their federal badges under the noses of State Bar lawyers.

Holder: Balks On Investigation

Russoniello: Member, State Bar of California

Instead of defending their members and the integrity of their organization, they run with their tails between their legs.

Such organized infiltrations of a state bar association may create an enterprise-in-fact under RICO. In Boyle, __ U.S. __,  the Court rejected the argument that an enterprise required a formal and ascertainable structure and