Is Grand Jury Tampering Rooted In Fed’s Psychological Disorders

Holder

Is the tampering of Nevada’s Federal Grand jury rooted in psychological disorders? That is a question being asked by Network CEO Phil Stimac after a recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Robert Jones that he and not the grand jury has the right to weigh and act upon grand jury evidence.

Brown

“Although I will defer to U.S. Surgeon General Regina Benjamin,” Stimac said, “I think Judge Jones’ ruling is sending up a red flag in the minds of many Nevada residents. 

Haag

“The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [4th Ed.] discusses unhealthy psychological and personality traits which I believe are being demonstrated by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, California Governor Jerry Brown and San Francisco U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag, key players in the case.

“Narcissistic Personality Disorder [DSM 301.81] is revealed by grandiosity, senses of specialness, self-importance, unfair and unreasonable entitlement which can only be understood by other special or high-status people coupled with the inability to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others. What other reasons might there be for such a whimsical ruling which divests our federal grand jury of its exclusive right to review evidence submitted by Nevada citizens?

“According to the Manual, the behavior patterns of some of rackeeters like Ms. Haag may also be the product of Adult Antisocial Behavior [DSM V71.01]. Because they also resemble Borderline Intellectual Functioning [DSM V62.89], I believe Judge Jones’ mental state may impair his ability to serve on the federal bench and have asked Senator Harry Reid to submit the issue to the Senate Judiciary Committee.”